NEWS
Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited awarded security for its costs as defendant in abuse of dominance proceedings by Chemistree
4 November 2011
Briggs J ordered that Chemistree must pay £750,000 to Teva by way of security in a series of staggered payments. The Judge held that, in defending itself against Chemistree's claims, Teva was entitled to incur legal costs that reflected "the best legal representation that it could secure." The Judge was critical of the limited disclosure made by Chemistree and, in particular, its failure to provide audited accounts. He found that Teva had shown, relying on evidence from an expert accountant, that there was reason to believe that Chemistree would be unable to pay Teva's costs if Teva was successful at the end of the trial. The Court was also unpersuaded by Chemistree's argument, on the evidence put before it, that the claim would be "stifled" if it were ordered to pay any more than £350,000. It was therefore just to make the order for security for costs. The Judge also rejected Chemistree's argument that the Court should apply a different test in exercising its discretion to award security because their claim concerned EU law rights or was, in Chemistree's submission, a test case.
Ronit Kreisberger and Owain Draper acted for Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Please click below for more information on:
Ronit Kreisberger
Owain Draper
4/5/2012 Gerry Facenna and Laura Elizabeth John win 3 year fight for ministerial papers' release
1/5/2012 Eric Metcalfe appointed Fellow of the Bingham Centre of the Rule of Law
27/4/2012 The Tax Journal's One Minute with Melanie Hall QC
10/2/2012 Carlsberg (UK) Ltd and Inbev (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2012] EWCA Civ 82, 8 February 2012 (CA)
17/1/2012 Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom (8139/09)
16/1/2012 JBW Ltd v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 8
24/9/2012 International Construction Law Conference 2012
11/9/2012 Construction Law Summer School 2012
JBW Ltd v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 8

